Forum
Compex Intensity vs mA
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Compex Intensity vs mA
How does one convert the intensity numbers on the new Compex (0 - 999) to milliamps (0 - 120)? The relationship isn't linear. I have been using the quadratic approximations:
mA = 3.8 * sqrt(intensity)
intensity = (mA)^2 / 14.4
-Roger Frye
mA = 3.8 * sqrt(intensity)
intensity = (mA)^2 / 14.4
-Roger Frye
- rfrye
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:17 pm
Re: Compex Intensity vs mA
Hi Roger,
I haven't been able to obtain a comparison chart from Compex as of yet, so I don't have a hard and fast rule for this. I have been told it varies form muscle group to muscle group. I am working on putting something together though, so I will certainly keep everyone in the loop as soon as I have more info.
Regards,
Jason
I haven't been able to obtain a comparison chart from Compex as of yet, so I don't have a hard and fast rule for this. I have been told it varies form muscle group to muscle group. I am working on putting something together though, so I will certainly keep everyone in the loop as soon as I have more info.
Regards,
Jason
- jason-keister
Re: Compex Intensity vs mA
I would have hoped that the software would be designed to cleanly assign each feature to one aspect of the waveform. Naive, I guess.
I was thinking:
intensity buttons control amplitude;
levels control length of stress and recovery and total times;
program type controls frequency and general training/rest pattern;
body segment controls waveform details like rise time of the square wave.
Oh well, the idea is pretty. Perhaps not practical.
-Roger Frye
I was thinking:
intensity buttons control amplitude;
levels control length of stress and recovery and total times;
program type controls frequency and general training/rest pattern;
body segment controls waveform details like rise time of the square wave.
Oh well, the idea is pretty. Perhaps not practical.
-Roger Frye
- rfrye
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:17 pm
Re: Compex Intensity vs mA
Hi Roger,
What you just detailed is correct. The frequency also increases with the level though. I just don't have a direct comparison chart between mA's and the Energy Levels that the Compex units use. I will certainly keep you posted as I obtain this info.
Regards,
Jason
What you just detailed is correct. The frequency also increases with the level though. I just don't have a direct comparison chart between mA's and the Energy Levels that the Compex units use. I will certainly keep you posted as I obtain this info.
Regards,
Jason
- jason-keister
Re: Compex Intensity vs mA
Roger,
There is a range of frequencies used for each of the strength programs. Strength: 75 HZ Level 1 to 100 Hz Level 5. Resistance: 50 H Level 1 to 70 Hz Level 5. Endurance: 10 Hz Level 1 to 18 Hz Level 5. The total time a contraction is held doesn’t effectively vary for the Endurance or Strength programs However for the Resistance program, the total time a contraction is held through the length of the program increase by 50% as the levels progress from 1 to 5.
Which body part you select determines the amplitude of the signal delivered.
AMPLITUDE is the pulse duration value. It is measured in microseconds [1 µsec = one millionth of a second] and it is usually set at the chronaxia value of the main nerve, which allows the muscle innervation to be activated.
CHRONAXIA is the needed time for stimulating the tissue by using an intensity double the intensity at the rheobase, the minimum current value to trigger an excitation no matter how long the duration of the stimulus.
Because of these differences in the strength programs from levels 1 through 5, it is best to spend time first at Level 1 and gradually work through the levels over a 6 to 8 week period to enjoy the full benefits.
Jim
There is a range of frequencies used for each of the strength programs. Strength: 75 HZ Level 1 to 100 Hz Level 5. Resistance: 50 H Level 1 to 70 Hz Level 5. Endurance: 10 Hz Level 1 to 18 Hz Level 5. The total time a contraction is held doesn’t effectively vary for the Endurance or Strength programs However for the Resistance program, the total time a contraction is held through the length of the program increase by 50% as the levels progress from 1 to 5.
Which body part you select determines the amplitude of the signal delivered.
AMPLITUDE is the pulse duration value. It is measured in microseconds [1 µsec = one millionth of a second] and it is usually set at the chronaxia value of the main nerve, which allows the muscle innervation to be activated.
CHRONAXIA is the needed time for stimulating the tissue by using an intensity double the intensity at the rheobase, the minimum current value to trigger an excitation no matter how long the duration of the stimulus.
Because of these differences in the strength programs from levels 1 through 5, it is best to spend time first at Level 1 and gradually work through the levels over a 6 to 8 week period to enjoy the full benefits.
Jim
- jbruskewitz
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:57 pm
Re: Compex Intensity vs mA
Jim,
Thanks for the details about AMPLITUDE and CHRONAXIA and how the frequency changes with level. Very interesting.
In electrical engineering, the amplitude of a square wave is how far it goes off the x-axis, and the period is how long it takes to go through a full cycle. From your description, it sounds like NMES refers to half the period as the AMPLITUDE.
Jason,
Thanks for trying to find the intensity vs mA tables.
-RogerF
Thanks for the details about AMPLITUDE and CHRONAXIA and how the frequency changes with level. Very interesting.
In electrical engineering, the amplitude of a square wave is how far it goes off the x-axis, and the period is how long it takes to go through a full cycle. From your description, it sounds like NMES refers to half the period as the AMPLITUDE.
Jason,
Thanks for trying to find the intensity vs mA tables.
-RogerF
- rfrye
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:17 pm
Re: Compex Intensity vs mA
Hi Roger,
You can now find a condensed conversion chart on our website. Here's the link:
http://www.hammernutrition.com/download ... -Chart.pdf
Hope this is helpful, let me know if you have any additional questions.
Regards,
Jason
You can now find a condensed conversion chart on our website. Here's the link:
http://www.hammernutrition.com/download ... -Chart.pdf
Hope this is helpful, let me know if you have any additional questions.
Regards,
Jason
- jason-keister
Re: Compex Intensity vs mA
Quite amazing.
About all that I will remember when I am using the Compex will be that Energy Level 100 for upper legs is 39 mA.
Thanks.
-Roger Frye
About all that I will remember when I am using the Compex will be that Energy Level 100 for upper legs is 39 mA.
Thanks.
-Roger Frye
- rfrye
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:17 pm
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Electrical Muscle Stimulation
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



